Preliminary Evidence of Good Safety Profile and Outcomes of Early Treatment With Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab Compared to Previously Employed Monoclonal Antibodies for COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Patients (preprint)

Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have proven to be a valuable tool against COVID-19, mostly among subjects with risk factors for progression to severe illness. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CIL), a combination of two Fc-modified human monoclonal antibodies, has been recently approved to be employed as early treatment. Methods: Two groups of immunocompromised patients exposed to different early treatments (i.e., TIX/CIL vs. other mAbs [casirivimab/imdevimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab, sotrovimab]) were compared in terms of clinical outcomes (hospitalization and mortality within 14 days from administration) and time to the negativity of nasal swabs. We used either Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, whereas the Wilcoxon rank–sum test was employed for continuous ones. Kaplan–Meier curves were produced to compare the time to nasopharyngeal swab negativity. Results: Early treatment with TIX/CIL was administered to 19 immunocompromised patients, while 89 patients received other mAbs. Most of them were solid organ transplant recipients or suffering from hematologic or solid malignancies. Overall, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of clinical outcomes. In the TIX/CIL group, one patient (1/19, 5.3%), who was admitted to the emergency room within the first 14 days from treatment and was hospitalised due to COVID-19 progression, died. Regarding the time to nasal swab negativity, no significant difference (p=0.088) emerged. Conclusions: Early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection with TIX/CIL shows favourable outcomes in a small group of immunocompromised patients, reporting no significant difference when compared to similar patients treated with other mAbs.

Anti-Spike Antibodies and Neutralising Antibody Activity in People Living with HIV Vaccinated with COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Vaccine: A Prospective Cohort Study (preprint)

Background: Vaccines against COVID-19 are a powerful tool to control the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A thorough description of their immunogenicity among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) is necessary. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 vaccine among PLWHIV.Methods: In this prospective cohort, adult PLWHIV outpatients were enrolled during the Italian vaccination campaign. Enrolment was allowed irrespective of ongoing combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), plasma HIV viral load and CD4+ T cell count. A two-dose regimen of mRNA-1273, with administrations performed 28 days apart, was employed. The primary outcomes were anti-spike (anti-S) antibody titres and neutralising antibody activity, assessed 28 days after completing the vaccination schedule, compared with individuals not affected by HIV (referred as healthy-donors, HDs). Findings: CD4+ T cell count groups and anti-nucleocapside (anti-N) positive serology were the only variables associated with anti-spike (anti-S) antibody titres (expressed as U/mL) and neutralising antibody activity. Anti-S antibodies were higher in COVID-19-experienced PLWHIV (median 12500 U/mL IQR [5704-12500]) than in COVID-19-naïve PLWHIV (median 2437 U/mL IQR [1485-4526]) but did not differ from those observed in COVID-19-experienced HDs (median 1077 U/mL IQR [702-7551]). Neutralising antibody activity in sera was higher in COVID-19-experienced PLWHIV (median 10888 IQR [2478-14416]) compared to COVID-19-naïve PLWHIV (median 1192 IQR [742-2421]) but was comparable to those observed in COVID-19-experienced HDs (median 20959 U/mL IQR [10060-31857]). When stratified according to CD4+ T cell count (<350 cells/μL, 350-500 cells/μL, >500 cells/μL), anti-S antibody titres (median 2173 U/mL [IQR 897-4109], 5763 IU/mL [IQR 4801-12500], 2449 U/mL [IQR 1524-5704]) were not lower to those observed among HDs (median 1425 U/mL [IQR 599-6131]). In addition, neutralising antibody activity, stratified according to the CD4+ T cell count (median 1314 [IQR 606-2477], 3329 IU/mL [IQR 1905-10508], 1227 U/mL [IQR 761-3032]), was similar to those displayed by HDs (median 2112 U/mL [IQR 719-8889]).Interpretation: Inoculation with mRNA-1273 vaccine given 4 weeks apart produced adequate immune responses in PLWHIV, who are well controlled on ART, irrespective of CD4+ T cell count and equivalent to individuals without HIV infection, supporting vaccination in PLWHIV.Funding: This study was partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente 2021 and Grant Ricerca Finalizzata GR 2018-12365699, by Intesa San Paolo COVID-19 emergency 2020 funds, and by Fondazione Cariplo (INNATE-CoV).Declaration of Interest: All other authors declare no competing interests.Ethical Approval: The study protocol (286_2021) was approved by the INMI “Lazzaro Spallanzani” Ethics Committee (Roma, Italy),

Clinical Characteristics of Healthcare Workers with SARS-CoV-2 Infection after Vaccination with BNT162b2 Vaccine (preprint)

Background: The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has hardly affected the entire world. Vaccines against COVID-19 appear as a tool able to curb out the mortality and to reduce the circulation of the virus. Little is known so far about the clinical characteristics of individuals who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection after having received the vaccination, as well as the temporal relationship between vaccine administration and symptoms onset.Methods: Retrospective cohort study among the healthcare workers (HCWs) of the Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milano, vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection (documented through positive RT-PCR on NPSs). Results: Overall, we have identified 15 HCWs with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, 7 (46.7%) of them were male and the mean age was 38.4 years (SD 14). In 4 of them the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapside (anti-N) antibodies was assessed before vaccination and resulted positive in 1 case. In all HCWs the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (anti-S1) antibodies was assessed, in average 42.2 days after the completion of vaccination, with a mean value of 2,055 U/mL (SD 1,927.3). SARS-CoV-2 infection was ascertained in average 56.2 days after vaccination. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) of SARS-CoV-2 PCR was 26.4, the lineage was characterized in 9 HCWs. None of the HCWs reported a primary or secondary immunodeficiency. Regarding symptoms, they were reported only by 7 (46.7%) HCWs and appeared on average 55 days after the second dose of vaccination. Of those who reported symptoms, one (14.3%) had fever, 7 (100%) rhinitis/conjunctivitis, 4 (57.1%) taste and smell alterations, none had respiratory symptoms, 4 headache/arthralgia (57.1%) and 1 gastrointestinal symptoms (14.3%). All symptoms disappeared in a few days and no other unclassified symptoms were reported.Conclusions: Infections occurring after vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccine are mostly asymptomatic and are not associated with the serum titre of anti-S1 antibodies. We did not find a predominance of a specific viral variants, with several lineages represented. 

New susceptibility loci for severe COVID-19 by detailed GWAS analysis in European populations (preprint)

Due to the highly variable clinical phenotype of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), deepening the host genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 may further improve our understanding about underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we describe an extended GWAS meta-analysis of 3,260 COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and 12,483 population controls from Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany, as well as hypothesis-driven targeted analysis of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and chromosome Y haplotypes. We include detailed stratified analyses based on age, sex and disease severity. In addition to already established risk loci, our data identify and replicate two genome-wide significant loci at 17q21.31 and 19q13.33 associated with severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure. These associations implicate a highly pleiotropic ~0.9-Mb 17q21.31 inversion polymorphism, which affects lung function and immune and blood cell counts, and the NAPSA gene, involved in lung surfactant protein production, in COVID-19 pathogenesis.

Inflammatory biomarkers in pregnant women with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study (preprint)

Coronavirus disease 2019 is a pandemic viral disease affecting also obstetric patients and uncertainties exist about the prognostic role of inflammatory biomarkers and hemocytometry values in patients with this infection. To clarify that, we assessed the values of several inflammatory biomarkers and hemocytometry variables in a cohort of obstetric patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 and we correlated the values at admission with the need of oxygen supplementation during the hospitalization. Overall, among 27 (61%) pregnant women and 17 (39%) post-partum women, 6 (14%) patients received oxygen supplementation and 2 (4%) required admission to intensive care unit but none died. During hospitalization neutrophils (p=0.002), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (p=0.037) and C reactive protein (p<0.001) decreased significantly, whereas lymphocytes (p<0.001) and platelets (p<0.001) increased. Leukocytes and lymphocytes values at admission were correlated with oxygen need, with respectively a 1% and 5% higher risk of oxygen supplementation for each 1,000 cells decrease. Overall, in obstetric patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019, C reactive protein is the inflammatory biomarker that better mirrors the course of the disease whereas D-dimer or ferritin are not reliable predictors of poor outcome. Care to the need of oxygen supplementation should be reserved to patients with reduced leukocytes or lymphocytes values at admission.

Characteristics of 1,573 healthcare workers who underwent nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 in Milano, Lombardy, Italy (preprint)

BackgroundThe management of healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to confirmed cases of COVID-19 is still a matter of debate. It is unclear whether these subjects should be tested in the absence of symptoms and if those can guide diagnosis. MethodsOccupational and clinical characteristics of all the consecutive HCWs who performed a nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a University Hospital from February 24, 2020, to March 31, 2020, were collected. Frequencies of positive tests were compared according to selected variables. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were then applied. FindingsPositive tests were 138 among 1,573 HCWs (8.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.4-10.3), with a marked difference between symptomatic (20.2%, 95% CI: 16.7-24.1) and asymptomatic (3.7%, 95% CI: 2.7-5.1) subjects (p<0.001). Physicians were the group with the highest frequency of positive tests (10.6%, 95% CI: 8.3-13.4) whereas clerical workers and technicians displayed the lowest frequency (2.9%, 95% CI: 0.8-7.3). The likelihood of being positive increased with the number of reported symptoms and the strongest predictors of a positive test were taste and smell alterations (odds ratio [OR] = 29.7) and fever (OR = 7.21). The median time from first positive test to a negative test was 23 days (95% CI: 19-24). InterpretationIn this Italian group of HCWs exposed to confirmed cases of COVID-19 the presence of symptoms, especially taste and smell alterations and fever, was associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median time to clear the virus from nasopharynx was 23 days. Fundingnone related to the content of this manuscript. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed for articles published in English up to April 25, 2020, using the keywords "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", "2019-nCoV", AND "healthcare workers","HCW", AND "testing", "nasopharyngeal swab". We found one article: Roll-out of SARS-CoV-2 testing for healthcare workers at a large NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom, March 2020 published in Euro Surveillance. Reviewing the pre-print website medRxiv with the same keywords we identified two additional studies: SARS-CoV-2 infection in Health Care Workers in a large public hospital in Madrid, Spain, during March 2020, and SARS-CoV-2 infection in 86 healthcare workers in two Dutch hospitals in March. Added value of this studyWe showed that, even if symptomatic healthcare workers had a much higher probability of positive test, almost one third of those infected were asymptomatic. Specific symptoms, namely taste and smell alterations and fever, were strongly associated with the infection. Finally, the median time to clear the virus from nasopharynx was 23 days. Implications of all the available evidenceScreening strategies for healthcare workers exposed to COVID-19 patients should take in account the significant proportion of asymptomatic carriers and the predictive role of specific symptoms. Moreover, healthcare workers coming back to work after a positive test should be aware of the long-time of viral shedding from nasopharynx.